Demographics details for Portsmouth, NH vs Litchfield park, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Portsmouth, NH vs Litchfield park, AZ.

Data Portsmouth Litchfield park
Population 22,713 6,960
Median Age 42.1 years 47.7 years
Median Income $100,169 $117,601
Married Families 40.0% 52.0%
Poverty Level 5% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.1 5.1

Population Comparison: Portsmouth vs Litchfield park

  • In Portsmouth, the population is higher at 22,713, compared to 6,960 in Litchfield park.
  • The median age in Litchfield park is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 42.1 years in Portsmouth.
  • Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601, compared to $100,169 in Portsmouth.
  • In Litchfield park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 40.0% in Portsmouth.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Portsmouth and Litchfield park at 5%.
  • Litchfield park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 2.1% in Portsmouth.

Demographics

Demographics Portsmouth vs Litchfield park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Portsmouth Litchfield park
Black 1 2
White 89 57
Asian 4 6
Hispanic 2 23
Two or More Races 4 12
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Portsmouth vs Litchfield park

  • In Litchfield park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Portsmouth.
  • Portsmouth has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 57% in Litchfield park.
  • In Litchfield park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 4% in Portsmouth.
  • Litchfield park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 2% in Portsmouth.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Litchfield park at 12%, compared to 4% in Portsmouth.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Portsmouth and Litchfield park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Portsmouth Litchfield park
Mental Health Not Good 14.0% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 8.1% 8.3%
Depression 22.8% 18.9%
Smoking 11.5% 10.7%
Binge Drinking 18.5% 18.9%
Obesity 27.6% 27.2%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Portsmouth vs Litchfield park

  • In Litchfield park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Portsmouth.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Portsmouth at 22.8% compared to 18.9% in Litchfield park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Portsmouth at 11.5% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 18.5% in Portsmouth.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Portsmouth at 27.6% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Litchfield park at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Portsmouth.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Portsmouth Litchfield park
No Schooling 0.3% (65) 0.2% (16)
High School Diploma 10.8% (2,450) 11.2% (777)
Less than High School 4.0% (898) 2.2% (150)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 47.4% (10,777) 36.0% (2,504)

Education Levels Comparison: Portsmouth vs Litchfield park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Portsmouth have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
  • In Litchfield park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.2% compared to 10.8% in Portsmouth.
  • More residents in Portsmouth have less than a high school education at 4.0% compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Portsmouth hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.4% compared to 36.0% in Litchfield park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.