Demographics details for Porterville, CA vs Scott city, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Porterville, CA vs Scott city, KS.
Data | Porterville | Scott city |
---|---|---|
Population | 62,998 | 4,008 |
Median Age | 31.3 years | 36.0 years |
Median Income | $55,785 | $47,217 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 23% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 14.6 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Porterville vs Scott city
- In Porterville, the population is higher at 62,998, compared to 4,008 in Scott city.
- The median age in Scott city is higher at 36.0 years, compared to 31.3 years in Porterville.
- Porterville has a higher median income of $55,785 compared to $47,217 in Scott city.
- In Scott city, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 33.0% in Porterville.
- Porterville has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 10% in Scott city.
- The unemployment rate in Porterville is higher at 14.6%, compared to 4.0% in Scott city.
Demographics
Demographics Porterville vs Scott city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Porterville | Scott city |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 1 | 69 |
Asian | 4 | 1 |
Hispanic | 71 | 25 |
Two or More Races | 21 | 5 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Porterville vs Scott city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Porterville at 1% compared to 0% in Scott city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Scott city at 69% compared to 1% in Porterville.
- The Asian population is larger in Porterville at 4% compared to 1% in Scott city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Porterville at 71% compared to 25% in Scott city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Porterville at 21% compared to 5% in Scott city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Porterville at 2% compared to 0% in Scott city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Porterville | Scott city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 15.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 10.3% |
Depression | 20.6% | 19.7% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 17.6% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 19.2% |
Obesity | 36.4% | 38.1% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Porterville vs Scott city
- More residents in Porterville report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.6% in Scott city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Porterville at 20.6% compared to 19.7% in Scott city.
- Scott city has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 17.3% in Porterville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Scott city at 19.2% compared to 14.1% in Porterville.
- Scott city has higher obesity rates at 38.1% compared to 36.4% in Porterville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Scott city at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Porterville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Porterville | Scott city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.8% (1,751) | 2.9% (116) |
High School Diploma | 12.2% (7,695) | 13.5% (543) |
Less than High School | 35.0% (22,037) | 24.2% (968) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (5,010) | 12.2% (490) |
Education Levels Comparison: Porterville vs Scott city
- In Scott city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 2.8% in Porterville.
- In Scott city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.5% compared to 12.2% in Porterville.
- More residents in Porterville have less than a high school education at 35.0% compared to 24.2% in Scott city.
- In Scott city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 8.0% in Porterville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.