Demographics details for Porterville, CA vs Mccomb, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Porterville, CA vs Mccomb, MS.
| Data | Porterville | Mccomb |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,998 | 12,041 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $55,785 | $37,288 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 23% | 22% |
| Unemployment Rate | 14.6 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: Porterville vs Mccomb
- In Porterville, the population is higher at 62,998, compared to 12,041 in Mccomb.
- The median age in Mccomb is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 31.3 years in Porterville.
- Porterville has a higher median income of $55,785 compared to $37,288 in Mccomb.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Porterville at 33.0% compared to 23.0% in Mccomb.
- Porterville has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 22% in Mccomb.
- The unemployment rate in Porterville is higher at 14.6%, compared to 6.2% in Mccomb.
Demographics
Demographics Porterville vs Mccomb provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Porterville | Mccomb |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 75 |
| White | 1 | 22 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 71 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 1 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Porterville vs Mccomb
- In Mccomb, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 75% compared to 1% in Porterville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mccomb at 22% compared to 1% in Porterville.
- The Asian population is larger in Porterville at 4% compared to 0% in Mccomb.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Porterville at 71% compared to 2% in Mccomb.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Porterville at 21% compared to 1% in Mccomb.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Porterville at 2% compared to 0% in Mccomb.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Porterville | Mccomb |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 16.2% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 25.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 10.8% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 48.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Porterville vs Mccomb
- In Mccomb, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 19.1% in Porterville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mccomb at 24.3% versus 20.6% in Porterville.
- Mccomb has a higher smoking rate at 25.9% compared to 17.3% in Porterville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Porterville at 14.1% compared to 10.8% in Mccomb.
- Mccomb has higher obesity rates at 48.5% compared to 36.4% in Porterville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mccomb at 21.0% compared to 10.0% in Porterville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Porterville | Mccomb |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (1,751) | 0.7% (81) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (7,695) | 22.1% (2,666) |
| Less than High School | 35.0% (22,037) | 11.2% (1,349) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (5,010) | 12.1% (1,460) |
Education Levels Comparison: Porterville vs Mccomb
- A higher percentage of residents in Porterville have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.7% in Mccomb.
- In Mccomb, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.1% compared to 12.2% in Porterville.
- More residents in Porterville have less than a high school education at 35.0% compared to 11.2% in Mccomb.
- In Mccomb, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 8.0% in Porterville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.