Demographics details for Porterville, CA vs Farmington, NM
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Porterville, CA vs Farmington, NM.
Data | Porterville | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Population | 62,998 | 46,127 |
Median Age | 31.3 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $55,785 | $61,388 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 23% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 14.6 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Porterville vs Farmington
- In Porterville, the population is higher at 62,998, compared to 46,127 in Farmington.
- The median age in Farmington is higher at 35.7 years, compared to 31.3 years in Porterville.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $61,388, compared to $55,785 in Porterville.
- In Farmington, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 33.0% in Porterville.
- Porterville has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 10% in Farmington.
- The unemployment rate in Porterville is higher at 14.6%, compared to 5.2% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Porterville vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Porterville | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 1 | 32 |
Asian | 4 | 1 |
Hispanic | 71 | 26 |
Two or More Races | 21 | 11 |
American Indian | 2 | 29 |
Demographics Comparison: Porterville vs Farmington
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Porterville and Farmington at 1%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 32% compared to 1% in Porterville.
- The Asian population is larger in Porterville at 4% compared to 1% in Farmington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Porterville at 71% compared to 26% in Farmington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Porterville at 21% compared to 11% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 29%, compared to 2% in Porterville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Porterville | Farmington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 12.7% |
Depression | 20.6% | 20.1% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 18.2% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 13.5% |
Obesity | 36.4% | 34.4% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Porterville vs Farmington
- More residents in Porterville report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.6% in Farmington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Porterville at 20.6% compared to 20.1% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 17.3% in Porterville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Porterville at 14.1% compared to 13.5% in Farmington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Porterville at 36.4% compared to 34.4% in Farmington.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Farmington at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Porterville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Porterville | Farmington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.8% (1,751) | 0.5% (211) |
High School Diploma | 12.2% (7,695) | 13.4% (6,180) |
Less than High School | 35.0% (22,037) | 12.9% (5,929) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (5,010) | 13.0% (5,985) |
Education Levels Comparison: Porterville vs Farmington
- A higher percentage of residents in Porterville have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.5% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.4% compared to 12.2% in Porterville.
- More residents in Porterville have less than a high school education at 35.0% compared to 12.9% in Farmington.
- In Farmington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Porterville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.