Demographics details for Porterville, CA vs Elkhart, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Porterville, CA vs Elkhart, IN.
| Data | Porterville | Elkhart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,998 | 53,801 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $55,785 | $46,534 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 23% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 14.6 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Porterville vs Elkhart
- In Porterville, the population is higher at 62,998, compared to 53,801 in Elkhart.
- The median age in Elkhart is higher at 34.5 years, compared to 31.3 years in Porterville.
- Porterville has a higher median income of $55,785 compared to $46,534 in Elkhart.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Porterville at 33.0% compared to 27.0% in Elkhart.
- Porterville has a higher poverty level at 23% compared to 12% in Elkhart.
- The unemployment rate in Porterville is higher at 14.6%, compared to 5.5% in Elkhart.
Demographics
Demographics Porterville vs Elkhart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Porterville | Elkhart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 12 |
| White | 1 | 53 |
| Asian | 4 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 71 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 8 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Porterville vs Elkhart
- In Elkhart, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in Porterville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Elkhart at 53% compared to 1% in Porterville.
- The Asian population is larger in Porterville at 4% compared to 1% in Elkhart.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Porterville at 71% compared to 26% in Elkhart.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Porterville at 21% compared to 8% in Elkhart.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Porterville at 2% compared to 0% in Elkhart.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Porterville | Elkhart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 22.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 13.4% |
| Obesity | 36.4% | 41.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Porterville vs Elkhart
- More residents in Porterville report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.8% in Elkhart.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Elkhart at 26.6% versus 20.6% in Porterville.
- Elkhart has a higher smoking rate at 22.5% compared to 17.3% in Porterville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Porterville at 14.1% compared to 13.4% in Elkhart.
- Elkhart has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 36.4% in Porterville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Elkhart at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Porterville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Porterville | Elkhart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.8% (1,751) | 1.2% (638) |
| High School Diploma | 12.2% (7,695) | 21.0% (11,303) |
| Less than High School | 35.0% (22,037) | 21.9% (11,805) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (5,010) | 10.7% (5,742) |
Education Levels Comparison: Porterville vs Elkhart
- A higher percentage of residents in Porterville have no formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 1.2% in Elkhart.
- In Elkhart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.0% compared to 12.2% in Porterville.
- More residents in Porterville have less than a high school education at 35.0% compared to 21.9% in Elkhart.
- In Elkhart, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.7% compared to 8.0% in Porterville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.