Demographics details for Portage, WI vs Central falls, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Portage, WI vs Central falls, RI.
Data | Portage | Central falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,200 | 22,490 |
Median Age | 36.7 years | 31.5 years |
Median Income | $59,619 | $43,092 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Portage vs Central falls
- The population in Central falls is higher at 22,490, compared to 10,200 in Portage.
- Residents in Portage have a higher median age of 36.7 years compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
- Portage has a higher median income of $59,619 compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Portage at 31.0% compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Central falls at 20%, compared to 10% in Portage.
- Central falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.5% in Portage.
Demographics
Demographics Portage vs Central falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Portage | Central falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 8 |
White | 81 | 4 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | 69 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 18 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Portage vs Central falls
- In Central falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 5% in Portage.
- Portage has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 4% in Central falls.
- The Asian population is larger in Portage at 1% compared to 0% in Central falls.
- Central falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 69%, compared to 7% in Portage.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central falls at 18%, compared to 5% in Portage.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Portage and Central falls at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Portage | Central falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 19.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 17.4% |
Depression | 22.3% | 26.7% |
Smoking | 19.1% | 22.8% |
Binge Drinking | 24.8% | 14.2% |
Obesity | 37.8% | 40.6% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Portage vs Central falls
- In Central falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.6% in Portage.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central falls at 26.7% versus 22.3% in Portage.
- Central falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 19.1% in Portage.
- Binge drinking is more common in Portage at 24.8% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
- Central falls has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 37.8% in Portage.
- Disability percentages are higher in Portage at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Central falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Portage | Central falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (54) | 4.7% (1,048) |
High School Diploma | 19.0% (1,933) | 15.1% (3,406) |
Less than High School | 11.7% (1,196) | 44.1% (9,911) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (1,229) | 5.6% (1,270) |
Education Levels Comparison: Portage vs Central falls
- In Central falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 0.5% in Portage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Portage hold a high school diploma at 19.0% compared to 15.1% in Central falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central falls at 44.1%, compared to 11.7% in Portage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Portage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.