Demographics details for Port lavaca, TX vs Okeechobee, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port lavaca, TX vs Okeechobee, FL.
| Data | Port lavaca | Okeechobee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,262 | 40,412 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 40.8 years |
| Median Income | $58,871 | $50,476 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Port lavaca vs Okeechobee
- The population in Okeechobee is higher at 40,412, compared to 11,262 in Port lavaca.
- The median age in Okeechobee is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 34.8 years in Port lavaca.
- Port lavaca has a higher median income of $58,871 compared to $50,476 in Okeechobee.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Port lavaca at 42.0% compared to 38.0% in Okeechobee.
- The poverty level is higher in Okeechobee at 16%, compared to 15% in Port lavaca.
- The unemployment rate in Port lavaca is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in Okeechobee.
Demographics
Demographics Port lavaca vs Okeechobee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port lavaca | Okeechobee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 8 |
| White | 6 | 58 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 64 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Okeechobee
- In Okeechobee, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 5% in Port lavaca.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Okeechobee at 58% compared to 6% in Port lavaca.
- The Asian population is larger in Port lavaca at 7% compared to 1% in Okeechobee.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port lavaca at 64% compared to 26% in Okeechobee.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port lavaca at 18% compared to 7% in Okeechobee.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port lavaca and Okeechobee at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port lavaca | Okeechobee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 23.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 33.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Okeechobee
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Port lavaca and Okeechobee at 17.3%.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port lavaca at 21.5% compared to 20.1% in Okeechobee.
- Okeechobee has a higher smoking rate at 23.7% compared to 17.5% in Port lavaca.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port lavaca at 16.9% compared to 15.4% in Okeechobee.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port lavaca at 38.4% compared to 33.9% in Okeechobee.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port lavaca at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Okeechobee.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port lavaca | Okeechobee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (230) | 1.9% (751) |
| High School Diploma | 21.3% (2,404) | 18.6% (7,520) |
| Less than High School | 24.2% (2,728) | 26.7% (10,783) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (1,091) | 11.8% (4,773) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port lavaca vs Okeechobee
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.9% in Okeechobee.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 18.6% in Okeechobee.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Okeechobee at 26.7%, compared to 24.2% in Port lavaca.
- In Okeechobee, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 9.7% in Port lavaca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.