Demographics details for Port lavaca, TX vs Methuen, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port lavaca, TX vs Methuen, MA.
| Data | Port lavaca | Methuen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,262 | 53,241 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $58,871 | $93,681 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Port lavaca vs Methuen
- The population in Methuen is higher at 53,241, compared to 11,262 in Port lavaca.
- The median age in Methuen is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 34.8 years in Port lavaca.
- Methuen has a higher median income of $93,681, compared to $58,871 in Port lavaca.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Port lavaca at 42.0% compared to 39.0% in Methuen.
- Port lavaca has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Methuen.
- Methuen has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 4.2% in Port lavaca.
Demographics
Demographics Port lavaca vs Methuen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port lavaca | Methuen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 5 |
| White | 6 | 51 |
| Asian | 7 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 64 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Methuen
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Port lavaca and Methuen at 5%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Methuen at 51% compared to 6% in Port lavaca.
- The Asian population is larger in Port lavaca at 7% compared to 4% in Methuen.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port lavaca at 64% compared to 30% in Methuen.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port lavaca at 18% compared to 10% in Methuen.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port lavaca and Methuen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port lavaca | Methuen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 30.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Methuen
- More residents in Port lavaca report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 17.1% in Methuen.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Methuen at 23.4% versus 21.5% in Port lavaca.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port lavaca at 17.5% compared to 14.1% in Methuen.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Methuen at 17.7% compared to 16.9% in Port lavaca.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port lavaca at 38.4% compared to 30.4% in Methuen.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port lavaca at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Methuen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port lavaca | Methuen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (230) | 1.4% (741) |
| High School Diploma | 21.3% (2,404) | 17.4% (9,266) |
| Less than High School | 24.2% (2,728) | 13.9% (7,384) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (1,091) | 21.3% (11,336) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port lavaca vs Methuen
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.4% in Methuen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 17.4% in Methuen.
- More residents in Port lavaca have less than a high school education at 24.2% compared to 13.9% in Methuen.
- In Methuen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 9.7% in Port lavaca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.