Demographics details for Port lavaca, TX vs Helen, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port lavaca, TX vs Helen, GA.
| Data | Port lavaca | Helen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,262 | 578 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 60.2 years |
| Median Income | $58,871 | $74,375 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Port lavaca vs Helen
- In Port lavaca, the population is higher at 11,262, compared to 578 in Helen.
- The median age in Helen is higher at 60.2 years, compared to 34.8 years in Port lavaca.
- Helen has a higher median income of $74,375, compared to $58,871 in Port lavaca.
- In Helen, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 42.0% in Port lavaca.
- Port lavaca has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Helen.
- Helen has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 4.2% in Port lavaca.
Demographics
Demographics Port lavaca vs Helen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port lavaca | Helen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 6 | 91 |
| Asian | 7 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 64 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Helen
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port lavaca at 5% compared to 0% in Helen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Helen at 91% compared to 6% in Port lavaca.
- Both Port lavaca and Helen have the same percentage of Asian residents at 7%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port lavaca at 64% compared to 0% in Helen.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port lavaca at 18% compared to 2% in Helen.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port lavaca and Helen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port lavaca | Helen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 12.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Helen
- More residents in Port lavaca report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 14.9% in Helen.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Helen at 21.8% versus 21.5% in Port lavaca.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port lavaca at 17.5% compared to 12.8% in Helen.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Helen at 17.1% compared to 16.9% in Port lavaca.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port lavaca at 38.4% compared to 28.6% in Helen.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Port lavaca and Helen at 18.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port lavaca | Helen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (230) | 0.3% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 21.3% (2,404) | 11.6% (67) |
| Less than High School | 24.2% (2,728) | 6.4% (37) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (1,091) | 28.4% (164) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port lavaca vs Helen
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.3% in Helen.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 11.6% in Helen.
- More residents in Port lavaca have less than a high school education at 24.2% compared to 6.4% in Helen.
- In Helen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 9.7% in Port lavaca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.