Demographics details for Port lavaca, TX vs Hawthorne, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port lavaca, TX vs Hawthorne, CA.

Data Port lavaca Hawthorne
Population 11,262 84,563
Median Age 34.8 years 33.3 years
Median Income $58,871 $72,298
Married Families 42.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 15% 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 5.7

Population Comparison: Port lavaca vs Hawthorne

  • The population in Hawthorne is higher at 84,563, compared to 11,262 in Port lavaca.
  • Residents in Port lavaca have a higher median age of 34.8 years compared to 33.3 years in Hawthorne.
  • Hawthorne has a higher median income of $72,298, compared to $58,871 in Port lavaca.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Port lavaca at 42.0% compared to 31.0% in Hawthorne.
  • Port lavaca has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Hawthorne.
  • Hawthorne has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.2% in Port lavaca.

Demographics

Demographics Port lavaca vs Hawthorne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port lavaca Hawthorne
Black 5 27
White 6 -10
Asian 7 7
Hispanic 64 57
Two or More Races 18 17
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Hawthorne

  • In Hawthorne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 27% compared to 5% in Port lavaca.
  • Port lavaca has a higher percentage of White residents at 6% compared to -10% in Hawthorne.
  • Both Port lavaca and Hawthorne have the same percentage of Asian residents at 7%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Port lavaca at 64% compared to 57% in Hawthorne.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Port lavaca at 18% compared to 17% in Hawthorne.
  • In Hawthorne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Port lavaca.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port lavaca Hawthorne
Mental Health Not Good 17.3% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 12.7%
Depression 21.5% 15.5%
Smoking 17.5% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 14.1%
Obesity 38.4% 32.9%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Hawthorne

  • More residents in Port lavaca report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 16.5% in Hawthorne.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Port lavaca at 21.5% compared to 15.5% in Hawthorne.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port lavaca at 17.5% compared to 12.7% in Hawthorne.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Port lavaca at 16.9% compared to 14.1% in Hawthorne.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port lavaca at 38.4% compared to 32.9% in Hawthorne.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port lavaca at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Hawthorne.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port lavaca Hawthorne
No Schooling 2.0% (230) 2.6% (2,159)
High School Diploma 21.3% (2,404) 14.5% (12,220)
Less than High School 24.2% (2,728) 26.9% (22,712)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.7% (1,091) 16.4% (13,868)

Education Levels Comparison: Port lavaca vs Hawthorne

  • In Hawthorne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 2.0% in Port lavaca.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 14.5% in Hawthorne.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hawthorne at 26.9%, compared to 24.2% in Port lavaca.
  • In Hawthorne, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 9.7% in Port lavaca.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.