Demographics details for Port lavaca, TX vs Greenville, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port lavaca, TX vs Greenville, NC.
| Data | Port lavaca | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,262 | 89,233 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 26.9 years |
| Median Income | $58,871 | $47,485 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Port lavaca vs Greenville
- The population in Greenville is higher at 89,233, compared to 11,262 in Port lavaca.
- Residents in Port lavaca have a higher median age of 34.8 years compared to 26.9 years in Greenville.
- Port lavaca has a higher median income of $58,871 compared to $47,485 in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Port lavaca at 42.0% compared to 24.0% in Greenville.
- The poverty level is higher in Greenville at 23%, compared to 15% in Port lavaca.
- Greenville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in Port lavaca.
Demographics
Demographics Port lavaca vs Greenville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port lavaca | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 39 |
| White | 6 | 50 |
| Asian | 7 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 64 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Greenville
- In Greenville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 39% compared to 5% in Port lavaca.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Greenville at 50% compared to 6% in Port lavaca.
- The Asian population is larger in Port lavaca at 7% compared to 3% in Greenville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port lavaca at 64% compared to 4% in Greenville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port lavaca at 18% compared to 4% in Greenville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port lavaca and Greenville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port lavaca | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 21.9% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 41.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Greenville
- More residents in Port lavaca report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 17.0% in Greenville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Greenville at 21.9% versus 21.5% in Port lavaca.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port lavaca at 17.5% compared to 17.1% in Greenville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port lavaca at 16.9% compared to 14.2% in Greenville.
- Greenville has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 38.4% in Port lavaca.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port lavaca at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Greenville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port lavaca | Greenville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (230) | 0.6% (512) |
| High School Diploma | 21.3% (2,404) | 10.3% (9,215) |
| Less than High School | 24.2% (2,728) | 4.6% (4,082) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (1,091) | 20.9% (18,672) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port lavaca vs Greenville
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.6% in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 10.3% in Greenville.
- More residents in Port lavaca have less than a high school education at 24.2% compared to 4.6% in Greenville.
- In Greenville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 9.7% in Port lavaca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.