Demographics details for Port lavaca, TX vs Gordon, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port lavaca, TX vs Gordon, GA.
| Data | Port lavaca | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,262 | 58,954 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $58,871 | $57,555 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Port lavaca vs Gordon
- The population in Gordon is higher at 58,954, compared to 11,262 in Port lavaca.
- The median age in Gordon is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 34.8 years in Port lavaca.
- Port lavaca has a higher median income of $58,871 compared to $57,555 in Gordon.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Port lavaca at 42.0% compared to 41.0% in Gordon.
- The poverty level is higher in Gordon at 20%, compared to 15% in Port lavaca.
- The unemployment rate in Port lavaca is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.7% in Gordon.
Demographics
Demographics Port lavaca vs Gordon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port lavaca | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 4 |
| White | 6 | 71 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 64 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Gordon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port lavaca at 5% compared to 4% in Gordon.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gordon at 71% compared to 6% in Port lavaca.
- The Asian population is larger in Port lavaca at 7% compared to 1% in Gordon.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port lavaca at 64% compared to 16% in Gordon.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port lavaca at 18% compared to 6% in Gordon.
- In Gordon, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Port lavaca.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port lavaca | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Gordon
- In Gordon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.3% in Port lavaca.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gordon at 23.1% versus 21.5% in Port lavaca.
- Gordon has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 17.5% in Port lavaca.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port lavaca at 16.9% compared to 15.7% in Gordon.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port lavaca at 38.4% compared to 37.2% in Gordon.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port lavaca at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Gordon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port lavaca | Gordon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (230) | 1.6% (918) |
| High School Diploma | 21.3% (2,404) | 17.8% (10,497) |
| Less than High School | 24.2% (2,728) | 28.5% (16,793) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (1,091) | 11.1% (6,523) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port lavaca vs Gordon
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.6% in Gordon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 17.8% in Gordon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gordon at 28.5%, compared to 24.2% in Port lavaca.
- In Gordon, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 9.7% in Port lavaca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.