Demographics details for Port lavaca, TX vs Chino hills, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port lavaca, TX vs Chino hills, CA.
| Data | Port lavaca | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,262 | 77,949 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $58,871 | $117,548 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Port lavaca vs Chino hills
- The population in Chino hills is higher at 77,949, compared to 11,262 in Port lavaca.
- The median age in Chino hills is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 34.8 years in Port lavaca.
- Chino hills has a higher median income of $117,548, compared to $58,871 in Port lavaca.
- In Chino hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 42.0% in Port lavaca.
- Port lavaca has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Chino hills.
- The unemployment rate in Port lavaca is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Chino hills.
Demographics
Demographics Port lavaca vs Chino hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port lavaca | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 4 |
| White | 6 | 14 |
| Asian | 7 | 40 |
| Hispanic | 64 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Chino hills
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port lavaca at 5% compared to 4% in Chino hills.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chino hills at 14% compared to 6% in Port lavaca.
- In Chino hills, the Asian population stands at 40%, greater than 7% in Port lavaca.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port lavaca at 64% compared to 29% in Chino hills.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port lavaca at 18% compared to 13% in Chino hills.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port lavaca and Chino hills at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port lavaca | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 14.6% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 7.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 28.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Chino hills
- More residents in Port lavaca report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 12.7% in Chino hills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port lavaca at 21.5% compared to 14.6% in Chino hills.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port lavaca at 17.5% compared to 7.9% in Chino hills.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port lavaca at 16.9% compared to 15.3% in Chino hills.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port lavaca at 38.4% compared to 28.4% in Chino hills.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port lavaca at 18.0% compared to 7.0% in Chino hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port lavaca | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (230) | 1.1% (849) |
| High School Diploma | 21.3% (2,404) | 9.6% (7,450) |
| Less than High School | 24.2% (2,728) | 7.2% (5,599) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (1,091) | 34.4% (26,814) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port lavaca vs Chino hills
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.1% in Chino hills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 9.6% in Chino hills.
- More residents in Port lavaca have less than a high school education at 24.2% compared to 7.2% in Chino hills.
- In Chino hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 9.7% in Port lavaca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.