Demographics details for Port lavaca, TX vs Ceres, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port lavaca, TX vs Ceres, CA.
| Data | Port lavaca | Ceres |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,262 | 48,988 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 32.3 years |
| Median Income | $58,871 | $70,191 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Port lavaca vs Ceres
- The population in Ceres is higher at 48,988, compared to 11,262 in Port lavaca.
- Residents in Port lavaca have a higher median age of 34.8 years compared to 32.3 years in Ceres.
- Ceres has a higher median income of $70,191, compared to $58,871 in Port lavaca.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Port lavaca at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Ceres.
- Port lavaca has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Ceres.
- Ceres has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 4.2% in Port lavaca.
Demographics
Demographics Port lavaca vs Ceres provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port lavaca | Ceres |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 6 | -3 |
| Asian | 7 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 64 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 26 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Ceres
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port lavaca at 5% compared to 2% in Ceres.
- Port lavaca has a higher percentage of White residents at 6% compared to -3% in Ceres.
- In Ceres, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 7% in Port lavaca.
- Ceres has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 64% in Port lavaca.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ceres at 26%, compared to 18% in Port lavaca.
- In Ceres, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Port lavaca.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port lavaca | Ceres |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 35.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Ceres
- In Ceres, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 17.3% in Port lavaca.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port lavaca at 21.5% compared to 21.0% in Ceres.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port lavaca at 17.5% compared to 16.1% in Ceres.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port lavaca at 16.9% compared to 15.6% in Ceres.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port lavaca at 38.4% compared to 35.7% in Ceres.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port lavaca at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Ceres.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port lavaca | Ceres |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (230) | 3.9% (1,891) |
| High School Diploma | 21.3% (2,404) | 18.8% (9,225) |
| Less than High School | 24.2% (2,728) | 29.1% (14,237) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (1,091) | 6.4% (3,156) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port lavaca vs Ceres
- In Ceres, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 2.0% in Port lavaca.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 18.8% in Ceres.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ceres at 29.1%, compared to 24.2% in Port lavaca.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.7% compared to 6.4% in Ceres.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.