Demographics details for Port lavaca, TX vs Carroll, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port lavaca, TX vs Carroll, NE.
| Data | Port lavaca | Carroll |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,262 | 191 |
| Median Age | 34.8 years | 34.0 years |
| Median Income | $58,871 | $57,813 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 77.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Port lavaca vs Carroll
- In Port lavaca, the population is higher at 11,262, compared to 191 in Carroll.
- Residents in Port lavaca have a higher median age of 34.8 years compared to 34.0 years in Carroll.
- Port lavaca has a higher median income of $58,871 compared to $57,813 in Carroll.
- In Carroll, the percentage of married families is higher at 77.0%, compared to 42.0% in Port lavaca.
- Port lavaca has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Carroll.
- The unemployment rate in Port lavaca is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Carroll.
Demographics
Demographics Port lavaca vs Carroll provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port lavaca | Carroll |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 6 | 90 |
| Asian | 7 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 64 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 18 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Carroll
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port lavaca at 5% compared to 0% in Carroll.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Carroll at 90% compared to 6% in Port lavaca.
- The Asian population is larger in Port lavaca at 7% compared to 1% in Carroll.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port lavaca at 64% compared to 6% in Carroll.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port lavaca at 18% compared to 3% in Carroll.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port lavaca and Carroll at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port lavaca | Carroll |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 21.5% | 16.0% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 13.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 24.2% |
| Obesity | 38.4% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 27.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Carroll
- More residents in Port lavaca report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 12.5% in Carroll.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port lavaca at 21.5% compared to 16.0% in Carroll.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port lavaca at 17.5% compared to 13.7% in Carroll.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Carroll at 24.2% compared to 16.9% in Port lavaca.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port lavaca at 38.4% compared to 36.6% in Carroll.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Carroll at 27.0% compared to 18.0% in Port lavaca.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port lavaca | Carroll |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (230) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 21.3% (2,404) | 26.7% (51) |
| Less than High School | 24.2% (2,728) | 13.6% (26) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (1,091) | 12.6% (24) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port lavaca vs Carroll
- A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.0% in Carroll.
- In Carroll, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.7% compared to 21.3% in Port lavaca.
- More residents in Port lavaca have less than a high school education at 24.2% compared to 13.6% in Carroll.
- In Carroll, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.6% compared to 9.7% in Port lavaca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.