Demographics details for Port lavaca, TX vs Apalachicola, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port lavaca, TX vs Apalachicola, FL.

Data Port lavaca Apalachicola
Population 11,262 2,395
Median Age 34.8 years 53.8 years
Median Income $58,871 $61,322
Married Families 42.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 15% 18%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.0

Population Comparison: Port lavaca vs Apalachicola

  • In Port lavaca, the population is higher at 11,262, compared to 2,395 in Apalachicola.
  • The median age in Apalachicola is higher at 53.8 years, compared to 34.8 years in Port lavaca.
  • Apalachicola has a higher median income of $61,322, compared to $58,871 in Port lavaca.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Port lavaca at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Apalachicola.
  • The poverty level is higher in Apalachicola at 18%, compared to 15% in Port lavaca.
  • The unemployment rate in Port lavaca is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in Apalachicola.

Demographics

Demographics Port lavaca vs Apalachicola provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port lavaca Apalachicola
Black 5 27
White 6 65
Asian 7 1
Hispanic 64 2
Two or More Races 18 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Apalachicola

  • In Apalachicola, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 27% compared to 5% in Port lavaca.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Apalachicola at 65% compared to 6% in Port lavaca.
  • The Asian population is larger in Port lavaca at 7% compared to 1% in Apalachicola.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Port lavaca at 64% compared to 2% in Apalachicola.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Port lavaca at 18% compared to 5% in Apalachicola.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port lavaca and Apalachicola at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port lavaca Apalachicola
Mental Health Not Good 17.3% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 12.1%
Depression 21.5% 19.8%
Smoking 17.5% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 15.3%
Obesity 38.4% 37.8%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port lavaca vs Apalachicola

  • In Apalachicola, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 17.3% in Port lavaca.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Port lavaca at 21.5% compared to 19.8% in Apalachicola.
  • Apalachicola has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 17.5% in Port lavaca.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Port lavaca at 16.9% compared to 15.3% in Apalachicola.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port lavaca at 38.4% compared to 37.8% in Apalachicola.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Apalachicola at 30.0% compared to 18.0% in Port lavaca.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port lavaca Apalachicola
No Schooling 2.0% (230) 1.0% (25)
High School Diploma 21.3% (2,404) 19.2% (461)
Less than High School 24.2% (2,728) 29.5% (707)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.7% (1,091) 26.2% (627)

Education Levels Comparison: Port lavaca vs Apalachicola

  • A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.0% in Apalachicola.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port lavaca hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 19.2% in Apalachicola.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Apalachicola at 29.5%, compared to 24.2% in Port lavaca.
  • In Apalachicola, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 9.7% in Port lavaca.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.