Demographics details for Port huron, MI vs Woodland, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port huron, MI vs Woodland, CA.
| Data | Port huron | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,626 | 61,462 |
| Median Age | 39.0 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $47,906 | $84,494 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.0 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Port huron vs Woodland
- The population in Woodland is higher at 61,462, compared to 28,626 in Port huron.
- Residents in Port huron have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 37.0 years in Woodland.
- Woodland has a higher median income of $84,494, compared to $47,906 in Port huron.
- In Woodland, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 30.0% in Port huron.
- Port huron has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Woodland.
- The unemployment rate in Port huron is higher at 7.0%, compared to 6.0% in Woodland.
Demographics
Demographics Port huron vs Woodland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port huron | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 2 |
| White | 76 | 21 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 20 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Port huron vs Woodland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port huron at 8% compared to 2% in Woodland.
- Port huron has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 21% in Woodland.
- In Woodland, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Port huron.
- Woodland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 7% in Port huron.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodland at 20%, compared to 8% in Port huron.
- In Woodland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Port huron.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port huron | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 28.2% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 25.7% | 12.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 40.5% | 28.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port huron vs Woodland
- More residents in Port huron report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 16.0% in Woodland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port huron at 28.2% compared to 18.8% in Woodland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port huron at 25.7% compared to 12.2% in Woodland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port huron at 16.7% compared to 16.4% in Woodland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port huron at 40.5% compared to 28.9% in Woodland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port huron at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Woodland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port huron | Woodland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (172) | 2.0% (1,223) |
| High School Diploma | 19.5% (5,596) | 13.9% (8,533) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (3,870) | 22.2% (13,649) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (3,662) | 19.0% (11,706) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port huron vs Woodland
- In Woodland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.6% in Port huron.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port huron hold a high school diploma at 19.5% compared to 13.9% in Woodland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodland at 22.2%, compared to 13.5% in Port huron.
- In Woodland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.0% compared to 12.8% in Port huron.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.