Demographics details for Port huron, MI vs Thompsons station, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port huron, MI vs Thompsons station, TN.

Data Port huron Thompsons station
Population 28,626 8,199
Median Age 39.0 years 36.1 years
Median Income $47,906 $116,569
Married Families 30.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 15% 3%
Unemployment Rate 7.0 2.6

Population Comparison: Port huron vs Thompsons station

  • In Port huron, the population is higher at 28,626, compared to 8,199 in Thompsons station.
  • Residents in Port huron have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 36.1 years in Thompsons station.
  • Thompsons station has a higher median income of $116,569, compared to $47,906 in Port huron.
  • In Thompsons station, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 30.0% in Port huron.
  • Port huron has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 3% in Thompsons station.
  • The unemployment rate in Port huron is higher at 7.0%, compared to 2.6% in Thompsons station.

Demographics

Demographics Port huron vs Thompsons station provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port huron Thompsons station
Black 8 2
White 76 84
Asian 1 4
Hispanic 7 1
Two or More Races 8 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port huron vs Thompsons station

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port huron at 8% compared to 2% in Thompsons station.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Thompsons station at 84% compared to 76% in Port huron.
  • In Thompsons station, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Port huron.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Port huron at 7% compared to 1% in Thompsons station.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Thompsons station at 11%, compared to 8% in Port huron.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port huron and Thompsons station at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port huron Thompsons station
Mental Health Not Good 20.8% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 15.0% 9.3%
Depression 28.2% 24.3%
Smoking 25.7% 13.5%
Binge Drinking 16.7% 17.0%
Obesity 40.5% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 5.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port huron vs Thompsons station

  • More residents in Port huron report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 15.1% in Thompsons station.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Port huron at 28.2% compared to 24.3% in Thompsons station.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port huron at 25.7% compared to 13.5% in Thompsons station.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Thompsons station at 17.0% compared to 16.7% in Port huron.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port huron at 40.5% compared to 29.2% in Thompsons station.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port huron at 22.0% compared to 5.0% in Thompsons station.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port huron Thompsons station
No Schooling 0.6% (172) 0.6% (51)
High School Diploma 19.5% (5,596) 11.2% (920)
Less than High School 13.5% (3,870) 4.1% (340)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.8% (3,662) 33.2% (2,725)

Education Levels Comparison: Port huron vs Thompsons station

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Port huron and Thompsons station at 0.6%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port huron hold a high school diploma at 19.5% compared to 11.2% in Thompsons station.
  • More residents in Port huron have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 4.1% in Thompsons station.
  • In Thompsons station, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.2% compared to 12.8% in Port huron.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.