Demographics details for Port huron, MI vs College park, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port huron, MI vs College park, MD.
Data | Port huron | College park |
---|---|---|
Population | 28,626 | 34,190 |
Median Age | 39.0 years | 21.6 years |
Median Income | $47,906 | $76,973 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 17.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.0 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Port huron vs College park
- The population in College park is higher at 34,190, compared to 28,626 in Port huron.
- Residents in Port huron have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 21.6 years in College park.
- College park has a higher median income of $76,973, compared to $47,906 in Port huron.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Port huron at 30.0% compared to 17.0% in College park.
- Port huron has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in College park.
- The unemployment rate in Port huron is higher at 7.0%, compared to 5.5% in College park.
Demographics
Demographics Port huron vs College park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Port huron | College park |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 23 |
White | 76 | 39 |
Asian | 1 | 14 |
Hispanic | 7 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port huron vs College park
- In College park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 8% in Port huron.
- Port huron has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 39% in College park.
- In College park, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 1% in Port huron.
- College park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 7% in Port huron.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port huron at 8% compared to 7% in College park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port huron and College park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Port huron | College park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 14.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Depression | 28.2% | 15.4% |
Smoking | 25.7% | 12.4% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 12.8% |
Obesity | 40.5% | 36.4% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port huron vs College park
- More residents in Port huron report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 14.8% in College park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port huron at 28.2% compared to 15.4% in College park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port huron at 25.7% compared to 12.4% in College park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port huron at 16.7% compared to 12.8% in College park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port huron at 40.5% compared to 36.4% in College park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port huron at 22.0% compared to 5.0% in College park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Port huron | College park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (172) | 1.9% (657) |
High School Diploma | 19.5% (5,596) | 6.4% (2,199) |
Less than High School | 13.5% (3,870) | 9.4% (3,210) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (3,662) | 19.8% (6,769) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port huron vs College park
- In College park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.6% in Port huron.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port huron hold a high school diploma at 19.5% compared to 6.4% in College park.
- More residents in Port huron have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 9.4% in College park.
- In College park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 12.8% in Port huron.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.