Demographics details for Port huron, MI vs Clarksville, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port huron, MI vs Clarksville, TN.
Data | Port huron | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Population | 28,626 | 176,974 |
Median Age | 39.0 years | 30.1 years |
Median Income | $47,906 | $62,688 |
Married Families | 30.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.0 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Port huron vs Clarksville
- The population in Clarksville is higher at 176,974, compared to 28,626 in Port huron.
- Residents in Port huron have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 30.1 years in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has a higher median income of $62,688, compared to $47,906 in Port huron.
- In Clarksville, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 30.0% in Port huron.
- Port huron has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Clarksville.
- The unemployment rate in Port huron is higher at 7.0%, compared to 4.3% in Clarksville.
Demographics
Demographics Port huron vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Port huron | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 22 |
White | 76 | 55 |
Asian | 1 | 3 |
Hispanic | 7 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port huron vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 8% in Port huron.
- Port huron has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 55% in Clarksville.
- In Clarksville, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Port huron.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 7% in Port huron.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clarksville at 9%, compared to 8% in Port huron.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port huron and Clarksville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Port huron | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.8% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 12.6% |
Depression | 28.2% | 28.4% |
Smoking | 25.7% | 20.1% |
Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 40.5% | 39.3% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port huron vs Clarksville
- More residents in Port huron report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 18.6% in Clarksville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksville at 28.4% versus 28.2% in Port huron.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port huron at 25.7% compared to 20.1% in Clarksville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port huron at 16.7% compared to 14.8% in Clarksville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port huron at 40.5% compared to 39.3% in Clarksville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port huron at 22.0% compared to 14.0% in Clarksville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Port huron | Clarksville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (172) | 0.6% (976) |
High School Diploma | 19.5% (5,596) | 13.7% (24,180) |
Less than High School | 13.5% (3,870) | 5.5% (9,720) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.8% (3,662) | 16.7% (29,557) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port huron vs Clarksville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Port huron and Clarksville at 0.6%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port huron hold a high school diploma at 19.5% compared to 13.7% in Clarksville.
- More residents in Port huron have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 5.5% in Clarksville.
- In Clarksville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 12.8% in Port huron.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.