Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs Webster, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs Webster, FL.

Data Port gibson Webster
Population 1,206 878
Median Age 47.3 years 42.4 years
Median Income $24,773 $53,125
Married Families 22.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 30% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 3.5

Population Comparison: Port gibson vs Webster

  • In Port gibson, the population is higher at 1,206, compared to 878 in Webster.
  • Residents in Port gibson have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 42.4 years in Webster.
  • Webster has a higher median income of $53,125, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
  • In Webster, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
  • Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 12% in Webster.
  • The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Webster.

Demographics

Demographics Port gibson vs Webster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port gibson Webster
Black 82 15
White 12 75
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 62
Two or More Races 6 31
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs Webster

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 15% in Webster.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Webster at 75% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
  • Both Port gibson and Webster have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Webster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 62%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Webster at 31%, compared to 6% in Port gibson.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port gibson and Webster at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port gibson Webster
Mental Health Not Good 19.0% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 16.0% 15.6%
Depression 20.0% 20.6%
Smoking 24.8% 26.9%
Binge Drinking 10.2% 14.7%
Obesity 50.5% 42.4%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs Webster

  • More residents in Port gibson report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.9% in Webster.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Webster at 20.6% versus 20.0% in Port gibson.
  • Webster has a higher smoking rate at 26.9% compared to 24.8% in Port gibson.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Webster at 14.7% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 42.4% in Webster.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 19.0% in Webster.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port gibson Webster
No Schooling 0.5% (6) 5.8% (51)
High School Diploma 9.8% (118) 32.9% (289)
Less than High School 13.3% (160) 36.4% (320)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.2% (256) 9.3% (82)

Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs Webster

  • In Webster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.8% compared to 0.5% in Port gibson.
  • In Webster, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.9% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Webster at 36.4%, compared to 13.3% in Port gibson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 9.3% in Webster.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.