Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs Wallsburg, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs Wallsburg, UT.

Data Port gibson Wallsburg
Population 1,206 297
Median Age 47.3 years 40.9 years
Median Income $24,773 $99,500
Married Families 22.0% 53.0%
Poverty Level 30% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.3 2.5

Population Comparison: Port gibson vs Wallsburg

  • In Port gibson, the population is higher at 1,206, compared to 297 in Wallsburg.
  • Residents in Port gibson have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 40.9 years in Wallsburg.
  • Wallsburg has a higher median income of $99,500, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
  • In Wallsburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
  • Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
  • The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 2.5% in Wallsburg.

Demographics

Demographics Port gibson vs Wallsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port gibson Wallsburg
Black 82 Data is updating
White 12 93
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 7
Two or More Races 6 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs Wallsburg

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Wallsburg at 93% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
  • Both Port gibson and Wallsburg have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Wallsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Port gibson at 6% compared to 0% in Wallsburg.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port gibson and Wallsburg at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port gibson Wallsburg
Mental Health Not Good 19.0% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 16.0% 9.7%
Depression 20.0% 22.8%
Smoking 24.8% 9.1%
Binge Drinking 10.2% 13.2%
Obesity 50.5% 28.0%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs Wallsburg

  • More residents in Port gibson report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.3% in Wallsburg.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Wallsburg at 22.8% versus 20.0% in Port gibson.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port gibson at 24.8% compared to 9.1% in Wallsburg.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Wallsburg at 13.2% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 28.0% in Wallsburg.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Wallsburg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port gibson Wallsburg
No Schooling 0.5% (6) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 9.8% (118) 27.6% (82)
Less than High School 13.3% (160) 7.4% (22)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.2% (256) 9.4% (28)

Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs Wallsburg

  • A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Wallsburg.
  • In Wallsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
  • More residents in Port gibson have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 7.4% in Wallsburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 9.4% in Wallsburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.