Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs Summerfield, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs Summerfield, OH.
| Data | Port gibson | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,206 | 242 |
| Median Age | 47.3 years | 49.8 years |
| Median Income | $24,773 | $29,412 |
| Married Families | 22.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Port gibson vs Summerfield
- In Port gibson, the population is higher at 1,206, compared to 242 in Summerfield.
- The median age in Summerfield is higher at 49.8 years, compared to 47.3 years in Port gibson.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $29,412, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- In Summerfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 13% in Summerfield.
- The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Port gibson vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port gibson | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 82 | Data is updating |
| White | 12 | 97 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs Summerfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Summerfield at 97% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- Both Port gibson and Summerfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Summerfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port gibson at 6% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port gibson and Summerfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port gibson | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 20.0% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 50.5% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs Summerfield
- More residents in Port gibson report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.1% in Summerfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Summerfield at 24.2% versus 20.0% in Port gibson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port gibson at 24.8% compared to 22.3% in Summerfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Summerfield at 17.9% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 39.2% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 17.0% in Summerfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port gibson | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 1.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 9.8% (118) | 31.4% (76) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (160) | 17.4% (42) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (256) | 2.1% (5) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Port gibson.
- In Summerfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.4% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Summerfield at 17.4%, compared to 13.3% in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 2.1% in Summerfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.