Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs Spring city, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs Spring city, PA.
Data | Port gibson | Spring city |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,206 | 3,495 |
Median Age | 47.3 years | 36.7 years |
Median Income | $24,773 | $70,181 |
Married Families | 22.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 30% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Port gibson vs Spring city
- The population in Spring city is higher at 3,495, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
- Residents in Port gibson have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 36.7 years in Spring city.
- Spring city has a higher median income of $70,181, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- In Spring city, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 5% in Spring city.
- The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 2.5% in Spring city.
Demographics
Demographics Port gibson vs Spring city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Port gibson | Spring city |
---|---|---|
Black | 82 | 4 |
White | 12 | 85 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs Spring city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 4% in Spring city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Spring city at 85% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- In Spring city, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Port gibson.
- Spring city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port gibson at 6% compared to 3% in Spring city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port gibson and Spring city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Port gibson | Spring city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 10.8% |
Depression | 20.0% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 24.8% | 16.9% |
Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 18.9% |
Obesity | 50.5% | 34.8% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs Spring city
- More residents in Port gibson report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 15.8% in Spring city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spring city at 23.0% versus 20.0% in Port gibson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port gibson at 24.8% compared to 16.9% in Spring city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Spring city at 18.9% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 34.8% in Spring city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 20.0% in Spring city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Port gibson | Spring city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 1.0% (34) |
High School Diploma | 9.8% (118) | 17.5% (613) |
Less than High School | 13.3% (160) | 8.8% (309) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (256) | 28.0% (980) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs Spring city
- In Spring city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Port gibson.
- In Spring city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.5% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- More residents in Port gibson have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 8.8% in Spring city.
- In Spring city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.0% compared to 21.2% in Port gibson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.