Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs San angelo, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs San angelo, TX.
Data | Port gibson | San angelo |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,206 | 99,112 |
Median Age | 47.3 years | 34.7 years |
Median Income | $24,773 | $65,040 |
Married Families | 22.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 30% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Port gibson vs San angelo
- The population in San angelo is higher at 99,112, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
- Residents in Port gibson have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 34.7 years in San angelo.
- San angelo has a higher median income of $65,040, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- In San angelo, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 13% in San angelo.
- The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.1% in San angelo.
Demographics
Demographics Port gibson vs San angelo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Port gibson | San angelo |
---|---|---|
Black | 82 | 5 |
White | 12 | 33 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 44 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs San angelo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 5% in San angelo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in San angelo at 33% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- In San angelo, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Port gibson.
- San angelo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 44%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San angelo at 16%, compared to 6% in Port gibson.
- In San angelo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Port gibson | San angelo |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 12.0% |
Depression | 20.0% | 23.9% |
Smoking | 24.8% | 16.3% |
Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 18.3% |
Obesity | 50.5% | 37.8% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs San angelo
- More residents in Port gibson report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.2% in San angelo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in San angelo at 23.9% versus 20.0% in Port gibson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port gibson at 24.8% compared to 16.3% in San angelo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in San angelo at 18.3% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 37.8% in San angelo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 14.0% in San angelo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Port gibson | San angelo |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 1.5% (1,444) |
High School Diploma | 9.8% (118) | 14.0% (13,867) |
Less than High School | 13.3% (160) | 17.7% (17,520) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (256) | 15.8% (15,619) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs San angelo
- In San angelo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Port gibson.
- In San angelo, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.0% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San angelo at 17.7%, compared to 13.3% in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 15.8% in San angelo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.