Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs San angelo, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs San angelo, TX.

Data Port gibson San angelo
Population 1,206 99,112
Median Age 47.3 years 34.7 years
Median Income $24,773 $65,040
Married Families 22.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 30% 13%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 4.1

Population Comparison: Port gibson vs San angelo

  • The population in San angelo is higher at 99,112, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
  • Residents in Port gibson have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 34.7 years in San angelo.
  • San angelo has a higher median income of $65,040, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
  • In San angelo, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
  • Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 13% in San angelo.
  • The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.1% in San angelo.

Demographics

Demographics Port gibson vs San angelo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port gibson San angelo
Black 82 5
White 12 33
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 44
Two or More Races 6 16
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs San angelo

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 5% in San angelo.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in San angelo at 33% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
  • In San angelo, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Port gibson.
  • San angelo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 44%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San angelo at 16%, compared to 6% in Port gibson.
  • In San angelo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port gibson San angelo
Mental Health Not Good 19.0% 17.2%
Physical Health Not Good 16.0% 12.0%
Depression 20.0% 23.9%
Smoking 24.8% 16.3%
Binge Drinking 10.2% 18.3%
Obesity 50.5% 37.8%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs San angelo

  • More residents in Port gibson report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.2% in San angelo.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in San angelo at 23.9% versus 20.0% in Port gibson.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port gibson at 24.8% compared to 16.3% in San angelo.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in San angelo at 18.3% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 37.8% in San angelo.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 14.0% in San angelo.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port gibson San angelo
No Schooling 0.5% (6) 1.5% (1,444)
High School Diploma 9.8% (118) 14.0% (13,867)
Less than High School 13.3% (160) 17.7% (17,520)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.2% (256) 15.8% (15,619)

Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs San angelo

  • In San angelo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Port gibson.
  • In San angelo, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.0% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San angelo at 17.7%, compared to 13.3% in Port gibson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 15.8% in San angelo.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.