Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs Peachtree city, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs Peachtree city, GA.

Data Port gibson Peachtree city
Population 1,206 39,562
Median Age 47.3 years 44.2 years
Median Income $24,773 $111,850
Married Families 22.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 30% 6%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 3.2

Population Comparison: Port gibson vs Peachtree city

  • The population in Peachtree city is higher at 39,562, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
  • Residents in Port gibson have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 44.2 years in Peachtree city.
  • Peachtree city has a higher median income of $111,850, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
  • In Peachtree city, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
  • Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 6% in Peachtree city.
  • The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.2% in Peachtree city.

Demographics

Demographics Port gibson vs Peachtree city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port gibson Peachtree city
Black 82 9
White 12 69
Asian Data is updating 8
Hispanic Data is updating 8
Two or More Races 6 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs Peachtree city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 9% in Peachtree city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Peachtree city at 69% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
  • In Peachtree city, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Port gibson.
  • Peachtree city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
  • Both Port gibson and Peachtree city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port gibson and Peachtree city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port gibson Peachtree city
Mental Health Not Good 19.0% 13.2%
Physical Health Not Good 16.0% 8.3%
Depression 20.0% 19.8%
Smoking 24.8% 10.0%
Binge Drinking 10.2% 17.5%
Obesity 50.5% 26.5%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs Peachtree city

  • More residents in Port gibson report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 13.2% in Peachtree city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Port gibson at 20.0% compared to 19.8% in Peachtree city.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port gibson at 24.8% compared to 10.0% in Peachtree city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Peachtree city at 17.5% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 26.5% in Peachtree city.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 10.0% in Peachtree city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port gibson Peachtree city
No Schooling 0.5% (6) 0.2% (80)
High School Diploma 9.8% (118) 9.0% (3,554)
Less than High School 13.3% (160) 2.6% (1,023)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.2% (256) 39.6% (15,684)

Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs Peachtree city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Peachtree city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson hold a high school diploma at 9.8% compared to 9.0% in Peachtree city.
  • More residents in Port gibson have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 2.6% in Peachtree city.
  • In Peachtree city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.6% compared to 21.2% in Port gibson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.