Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs Oakland, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs Oakland, CA.
| Data | Port gibson | Oakland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,206 | 430,553 |
| Median Age | 47.3 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $24,773 | $94,389 |
| Married Families | 22.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Port gibson vs Oakland
- The population in Oakland is higher at 430,553, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
- Residents in Port gibson have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 37.5 years in Oakland.
- Oakland has a higher median income of $94,389, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- In Oakland, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 13% in Oakland.
- The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 5.0% in Oakland.
Demographics
Demographics Port gibson vs Oakland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port gibson | Oakland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 82 | 22 |
| White | 12 | 24 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 16 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs Oakland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 22% in Oakland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Oakland at 24% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- In Oakland, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 0% in Port gibson.
- Oakland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oakland at 10%, compared to 6% in Port gibson.
- In Oakland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port gibson | Oakland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 20.0% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 12.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 50.5% | 30.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs Oakland
- More residents in Port gibson report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.2% in Oakland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port gibson at 20.0% compared to 17.8% in Oakland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port gibson at 24.8% compared to 12.0% in Oakland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Oakland at 14.7% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 30.5% in Oakland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port gibson | Oakland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 3.1% (13,479) |
| High School Diploma | 9.8% (118) | 10.9% (46,896) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (160) | 17.1% (73,435) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (256) | 36.3% (156,333) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs Oakland
- In Oakland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.5% in Port gibson.
- In Oakland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.9% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oakland at 17.1%, compared to 13.3% in Port gibson.
- In Oakland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.3% compared to 21.2% in Port gibson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.