Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs Naperville, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs Naperville, IL.
Data | Port gibson | Naperville |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,206 | 149,936 |
Median Age | 47.3 years | 39.5 years |
Median Income | $24,773 | $143,754 |
Married Families | 22.0% | 49.0% |
Poverty Level | 30% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Port gibson vs Naperville
- The population in Naperville is higher at 149,936, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
- Residents in Port gibson have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 39.5 years in Naperville.
- Naperville has a higher median income of $143,754, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- In Naperville, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 5% in Naperville.
- Naperville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 5.3% in Port gibson.
Demographics
Demographics Port gibson vs Naperville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Port gibson | Naperville |
---|---|---|
Black | 82 | 5 |
White | 12 | 61 |
Asian | Data is updating | 21 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 7 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs Naperville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 5% in Naperville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Naperville at 61% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- In Naperville, the Asian population stands at 21%, greater than 0% in Port gibson.
- Naperville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- Both Port gibson and Naperville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port gibson and Naperville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Port gibson | Naperville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 11.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 7.1% |
Depression | 20.0% | 16.6% |
Smoking | 24.8% | 9.0% |
Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 50.5% | 28.0% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs Naperville
- More residents in Port gibson report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 11.6% in Naperville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port gibson at 20.0% compared to 16.6% in Naperville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port gibson at 24.8% compared to 9.0% in Naperville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Naperville at 16.7% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 28.0% in Naperville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 6.0% in Naperville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Port gibson | Naperville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 0.5% (742) |
High School Diploma | 9.8% (118) | 5.7% (8,582) |
Less than High School | 13.3% (160) | 2.5% (3,797) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (256) | 47.8% (71,609) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs Naperville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Port gibson and Naperville at 0.5%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson hold a high school diploma at 9.8% compared to 5.7% in Naperville.
- More residents in Port gibson have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 2.5% in Naperville.
- In Naperville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.8% compared to 21.2% in Port gibson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.