Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs Murfreesboro, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs Murfreesboro, TN.

Data Port gibson Murfreesboro
Population 1,206 162,398
Median Age 47.3 years 31.5 years
Median Income $24,773 $70,451
Married Families 22.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 30% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 3.0

Population Comparison: Port gibson vs Murfreesboro

  • The population in Murfreesboro is higher at 162,398, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
  • Residents in Port gibson have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 31.5 years in Murfreesboro.
  • Murfreesboro has a higher median income of $70,451, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
  • In Murfreesboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
  • Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 10% in Murfreesboro.
  • The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.0% in Murfreesboro.

Demographics

Demographics Port gibson vs Murfreesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port gibson Murfreesboro
Black 82 17
White 12 66
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic Data is updating 7
Two or More Races 6 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs Murfreesboro

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 17% in Murfreesboro.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Murfreesboro at 66% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
  • In Murfreesboro, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Port gibson.
  • Murfreesboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Murfreesboro at 7%, compared to 6% in Port gibson.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port gibson and Murfreesboro at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port gibson Murfreesboro
Mental Health Not Good 19.0% 18.1%
Physical Health Not Good 16.0% 11.6%
Depression 20.0% 26.5%
Smoking 24.8% 18.3%
Binge Drinking 10.2% 15.5%
Obesity 50.5% 34.8%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs Murfreesboro

  • More residents in Port gibson report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.1% in Murfreesboro.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Murfreesboro at 26.5% versus 20.0% in Port gibson.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port gibson at 24.8% compared to 18.3% in Murfreesboro.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Murfreesboro at 15.5% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 34.8% in Murfreesboro.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 9.0% in Murfreesboro.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port gibson Murfreesboro
No Schooling 0.5% (6) 0.6% (920)
High School Diploma 9.8% (118) 10.7% (17,362)
Less than High School 13.3% (160) 6.2% (10,101)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.2% (256) 23.4% (38,019)

Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs Murfreesboro

  • In Murfreesboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Port gibson.
  • In Murfreesboro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.7% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
  • More residents in Port gibson have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 6.2% in Murfreesboro.
  • In Murfreesboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 21.2% in Port gibson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.