Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs Mountain view, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs Mountain view, AR.
Data | Port gibson | Mountain view |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,206 | 2,915 |
Median Age | 47.3 years | 55.5 years |
Median Income | $24,773 | $23,458 |
Married Families | 22.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 30% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Port gibson vs Mountain view
- The population in Mountain view is higher at 2,915, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
- The median age in Mountain view is higher at 55.5 years, compared to 47.3 years in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has a higher median income of $24,773 compared to $23,458 in Mountain view.
- In Mountain view, the percentage of married families is higher at 25.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 17% in Mountain view.
- The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.8% in Mountain view.
Demographics
Demographics Port gibson vs Mountain view provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Port gibson | Mountain view |
---|---|---|
Black | 82 | 1 |
White | 12 | 89 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs Mountain view
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 1% in Mountain view.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mountain view at 89% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- In Mountain view, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Port gibson.
- Mountain view has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port gibson at 6% compared to 1% in Mountain view.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port gibson and Mountain view at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Port gibson | Mountain view |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 22.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 16.7% |
Depression | 20.0% | 31.9% |
Smoking | 24.8% | 26.6% |
Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 50.5% | 41.1% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 36.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs Mountain view
- In Mountain view, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.6% compared to 19.0% in Port gibson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mountain view at 31.9% versus 20.0% in Port gibson.
- Mountain view has a higher smoking rate at 26.6% compared to 24.8% in Port gibson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mountain view at 14.9% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 41.1% in Mountain view.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mountain view at 36.0% compared to 23.0% in Port gibson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Port gibson | Mountain view |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 2.4% (70) |
High School Diploma | 9.8% (118) | 17.8% (520) |
Less than High School | 13.3% (160) | 15.9% (464) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (256) | 11.3% (329) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs Mountain view
- In Mountain view, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.5% in Port gibson.
- In Mountain view, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mountain view at 15.9%, compared to 13.3% in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 11.3% in Mountain view.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.