Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs Heyburn, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs Heyburn, ID.
| Data | Port gibson | Heyburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,206 | 3,640 |
| Median Age | 47.3 years | 26.5 years |
| Median Income | $24,773 | $61,443 |
| Married Families | 22.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Port gibson vs Heyburn
- The population in Heyburn is higher at 3,640, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
- Residents in Port gibson have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 26.5 years in Heyburn.
- Heyburn has a higher median income of $61,443, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- In Heyburn, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 11% in Heyburn.
- The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Heyburn.
Demographics
Demographics Port gibson vs Heyburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port gibson | Heyburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 82 | Data is updating |
| White | 12 | 70 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs Heyburn
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 0% in Heyburn.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Heyburn at 70% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- Both Port gibson and Heyburn have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Heyburn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port gibson at 6% compared to 3% in Heyburn.
- In Heyburn, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port gibson | Heyburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 20.0% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 50.5% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs Heyburn
- More residents in Port gibson report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.8% in Heyburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Heyburn at 22.9% versus 20.0% in Port gibson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port gibson at 24.8% compared to 18.5% in Heyburn.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Heyburn at 14.9% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 37.2% in Heyburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 14.0% in Heyburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port gibson | Heyburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 0.4% (15) |
| High School Diploma | 9.8% (118) | 20.5% (745) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (160) | 19.1% (694) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (256) | 12.3% (447) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs Heyburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Heyburn.
- In Heyburn, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.5% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Heyburn at 19.1%, compared to 13.3% in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 12.3% in Heyburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.