Environment details: Port gibson MS
water quality is moderate, continued monitoring needed.
Environment details: Falconer NY
water quality is poor, has urgent concerns.
Compare Environment: Port gibson MS vs Falconer NY
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Port gibson | Falconer |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 504 | 1248 |
| Water Quality | 5/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is moderate, continued monitoring needed. | water quality is poor, has urgent concerns. |
| Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.55 | 1.71 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 19 | 30 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Port gibson vs Falconer
- Water quality is rated higher in Port gibson at 5/10 compared to 3/10 in Falconer.
- Falconer has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Port gibson.
- Air quality is better in Falconer with an average index of 1.71 compared to 1.55 in Port gibson.
- Falconer experiences more days with poor air quality at 30 compared to 19 in Port gibson.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.