Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs Chickasha, OK.
| Data | Port gibson | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,206 | 16,549 |
| Median Age | 47.3 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $24,773 | $55,136 |
| Married Families | 22.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Port gibson vs Chickasha
- The population in Chickasha is higher at 16,549, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
- Residents in Port gibson have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has a higher median income of $55,136, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 17% in Chickasha.
- The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Port gibson vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port gibson | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 82 | 6 |
| White | 12 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs Chickasha
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 6% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chickasha at 71% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- Both Port gibson and Chickasha have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 6% in Port gibson.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port gibson | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.0% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 20.0% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 24.8% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 10.2% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 50.5% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 19.0% in Port gibson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 20.0% in Port gibson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port gibson at 24.8% compared to 21.8% in Chickasha.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chickasha at 13.8% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 40.8% in Chickasha.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 18.0% in Chickasha.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port gibson | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (6) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 9.8% (118) | 22.5% (3,730) |
| Less than High School | 13.3% (160) | 13.1% (2,160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (256) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs Chickasha
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Port gibson and Chickasha at 0.5%.
- In Chickasha, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.5% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- More residents in Port gibson have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 13.1% in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 12.5% in Chickasha.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.