Demographics details for Port gibson, MS vs Cedar park, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port gibson, MS vs Cedar park, TX.

Data Port gibson Cedar park
Population 1,206 77,642
Median Age 47.3 years 37.6 years
Median Income $24,773 $118,903
Married Families 22.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 30% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.3 3.6

Population Comparison: Port gibson vs Cedar park

  • The population in Cedar park is higher at 77,642, compared to 1,206 in Port gibson.
  • Residents in Port gibson have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 37.6 years in Cedar park.
  • Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903, compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
  • In Cedar park, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
  • Port gibson has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 5% in Cedar park.
  • The unemployment rate in Port gibson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.6% in Cedar park.

Demographics

Demographics Port gibson vs Cedar park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port gibson Cedar park
Black 82 3
White 12 55
Asian Data is updating 12
Hispanic Data is updating 20
Two or More Races 6 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port gibson vs Cedar park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port gibson at 82% compared to 3% in Cedar park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar park at 55% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
  • In Cedar park, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Port gibson.
  • Cedar park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 0% in Port gibson.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar park at 10%, compared to 6% in Port gibson.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port gibson and Cedar park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port gibson Cedar park
Mental Health Not Good 19.0% 14.9%
Physical Health Not Good 16.0% 8.8%
Depression 20.0% 24.1%
Smoking 24.8% 11.0%
Binge Drinking 10.2% 17.9%
Obesity 50.5% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port gibson vs Cedar park

  • More residents in Port gibson report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar park at 24.1% versus 20.0% in Port gibson.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port gibson at 24.8% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar park at 17.9% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port gibson at 50.5% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port gibson Cedar park
No Schooling 0.5% (6) 0.4% (287)
High School Diploma 9.8% (118) 8.9% (6,896)
Less than High School 13.3% (160) 4.1% (3,156)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.2% (256) 35.8% (27,785)

Education Levels Comparison: Port gibson vs Cedar park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Cedar park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port gibson hold a high school diploma at 9.8% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
  • More residents in Port gibson have less than a high school education at 13.3% compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
  • In Cedar park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 21.2% in Port gibson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.