Demographics details for Port clinton, OH vs Wichita falls, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port clinton, OH vs Wichita falls, TX.

Data Port clinton Wichita falls
Population 5,966 102,664
Median Age 44.9 years 32.8 years
Median Income $55,534 $55,584
Married Families 35.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 12% 14%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.9

Population Comparison: Port clinton vs Wichita falls

  • The population in Wichita falls is higher at 102,664, compared to 5,966 in Port clinton.
  • Residents in Port clinton have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 32.8 years in Wichita falls.
  • Wichita falls has a higher median income of $55,584, compared to $55,534 in Port clinton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Port clinton at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Wichita falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Wichita falls at 14%, compared to 12% in Port clinton.
  • Wichita falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Port clinton.

Demographics

Demographics Port clinton vs Wichita falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port clinton Wichita falls
Black 3 12
White 82 54
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 7 22
Two or More Races 8 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Port clinton vs Wichita falls

  • In Wichita falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 3% in Port clinton.
  • Port clinton has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 54% in Wichita falls.
  • In Wichita falls, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Port clinton.
  • Wichita falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 7% in Port clinton.
  • Both Port clinton and Wichita falls have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
  • In Wichita falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Port clinton.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port clinton Wichita falls
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 13.5% 12.5%
Depression 25.1% 24.6%
Smoking 24.0% 18.6%
Binge Drinking 17.9% 18.7%
Obesity 40.7% 37.1%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port clinton vs Wichita falls

  • More residents in Port clinton report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.3% in Wichita falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Port clinton at 25.1% compared to 24.6% in Wichita falls.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port clinton at 24.0% compared to 18.6% in Wichita falls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Wichita falls at 18.7% compared to 17.9% in Port clinton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port clinton at 40.7% compared to 37.1% in Wichita falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port clinton at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Wichita falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port clinton Wichita falls
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.0% (1,035)
High School Diploma 21.7% (1,296) 15.1% (15,510)
Less than High School 17.1% (1,023) 14.6% (14,970)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.8% (825) 15.1% (15,550)

Education Levels Comparison: Port clinton vs Wichita falls

  • In Wichita falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port clinton hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 15.1% in Wichita falls.
  • More residents in Port clinton have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 14.6% in Wichita falls.
  • In Wichita falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.1% compared to 13.8% in Port clinton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.