Demographics details for Port clinton, OH vs Western, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port clinton, OH vs Western, NE.
| Data | Port clinton | Western |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,966 | 224 |
| Median Age | 44.9 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $55,534 | $42,188 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Port clinton vs Western
- In Port clinton, the population is higher at 5,966, compared to 224 in Western.
- Residents in Port clinton have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 41.5 years in Western.
- Port clinton has a higher median income of $55,534 compared to $42,188 in Western.
- In Western, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Port clinton.
- Port clinton has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Western.
- The unemployment rate in Port clinton is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Western.
Demographics
Demographics Port clinton vs Western provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port clinton | Western |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 82 | 98 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port clinton vs Western
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port clinton at 3% compared to 0% in Western.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Western at 98% compared to 82% in Port clinton.
- Both Port clinton and Western have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port clinton at 7% compared to 2% in Western.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port clinton at 8% compared to 0% in Western.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port clinton and Western at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port clinton | Western |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 18.8% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 20.8% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port clinton vs Western
- More residents in Port clinton report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 13.8% in Western.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port clinton at 25.1% compared to 18.8% in Western.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port clinton at 24.0% compared to 17.6% in Western.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Western at 20.8% compared to 17.9% in Port clinton.
- Western has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 40.7% in Port clinton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Western at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Port clinton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port clinton | Western |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.9% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (1,296) | 25.4% (57) |
| Less than High School | 17.1% (1,023) | 17.0% (38) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (825) | 8.0% (18) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port clinton vs Western
- In Western, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
- In Western, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.4% compared to 21.7% in Port clinton.
- More residents in Port clinton have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 17.0% in Western.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port clinton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.8% compared to 8.0% in Western.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.