Demographics details for Port clinton, OH vs Trumann, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port clinton, OH vs Trumann, AR.
| Data | Port clinton | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,966 | 7,305 |
| Median Age | 44.9 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $55,534 | $37,618 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Port clinton vs Trumann
- The population in Trumann is higher at 7,305, compared to 5,966 in Port clinton.
- Residents in Port clinton have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 40.0 years in Trumann.
- Port clinton has a higher median income of $55,534 compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Port clinton and Trumann at 35.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Trumann at 13%, compared to 12% in Port clinton.
- Trumann has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Port clinton.
Demographics
Demographics Port clinton vs Trumann provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port clinton | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 5 |
| White | 82 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port clinton vs Trumann
- In Trumann, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Port clinton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Trumann at 84% compared to 82% in Port clinton.
- Both Port clinton and Trumann have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port clinton at 7% compared to 3% in Trumann.
- Both Port clinton and Trumann have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port clinton and Trumann at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port clinton | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 44.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port clinton vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 19.2% in Port clinton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Trumann at 28.5% versus 25.1% in Port clinton.
- Trumann has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 24.0% in Port clinton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port clinton at 17.9% compared to 14.4% in Trumann.
- Trumann has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 40.7% in Port clinton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 16.0% in Port clinton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port clinton | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.8% (135) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (1,296) | 25.9% (1,895) |
| Less than High School | 17.1% (1,023) | 24.4% (1,780) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (825) | 6.7% (487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port clinton vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
- In Trumann, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 21.7% in Port clinton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Trumann at 24.4%, compared to 17.1% in Port clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port clinton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.8% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.