Demographics details for Port clinton, OH vs Sulphur springs, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port clinton, OH vs Sulphur springs, TX.

Data Port clinton Sulphur springs
Population 5,966 16,408
Median Age 44.9 years 39.4 years
Median Income $55,534 $54,950
Married Families 35.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 12% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Port clinton vs Sulphur springs

  • The population in Sulphur springs is higher at 16,408, compared to 5,966 in Port clinton.
  • Residents in Port clinton have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 39.4 years in Sulphur springs.
  • Port clinton has a higher median income of $55,534 compared to $54,950 in Sulphur springs.
  • In Sulphur springs, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 35.0% in Port clinton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sulphur springs at 15%, compared to 12% in Port clinton.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Port clinton.

Demographics

Demographics Port clinton vs Sulphur springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port clinton Sulphur springs
Black 3 14
White 82 63
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 7 17
Two or More Races 8 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port clinton vs Sulphur springs

  • In Sulphur springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 3% in Port clinton.
  • Port clinton has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 63% in Sulphur springs.
  • In Sulphur springs, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Port clinton.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 7% in Port clinton.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Port clinton at 8% compared to 5% in Sulphur springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port clinton and Sulphur springs at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port clinton Sulphur springs
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.5% 13.2%
Depression 25.1% 24.8%
Smoking 24.0% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 17.9% 17.5%
Obesity 40.7% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port clinton vs Sulphur springs

  • More residents in Port clinton report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 19.1% in Sulphur springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Port clinton at 25.1% compared to 24.8% in Sulphur springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port clinton at 24.0% compared to 20.1% in Sulphur springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Port clinton at 17.9% compared to 17.5% in Sulphur springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port clinton at 40.7% compared to 39.5% in Sulphur springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port clinton at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Sulphur springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port clinton Sulphur springs
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.8% (127)
High School Diploma 21.7% (1,296) 18.3% (3,003)
Less than High School 17.1% (1,023) 16.0% (2,628)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.8% (825) 13.7% (2,248)

Education Levels Comparison: Port clinton vs Sulphur springs

  • In Sulphur springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port clinton hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 18.3% in Sulphur springs.
  • More residents in Port clinton have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 16.0% in Sulphur springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port clinton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.8% compared to 13.7% in Sulphur springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.