Demographics details for Port clinton, OH vs Los angeles, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port clinton, OH vs Los angeles, CA.
Data | Port clinton | Los angeles |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,966 | 3,822,238 |
Median Age | 44.9 years | 36.5 years |
Median Income | $55,534 | $76,244 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Port clinton vs Los angeles
- The population in Los angeles is higher at 3,822,238, compared to 5,966 in Port clinton.
- Residents in Port clinton have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 36.5 years in Los angeles.
- Los angeles has a higher median income of $76,244, compared to $55,534 in Port clinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Port clinton at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Los angeles.
- The poverty level is higher in Los angeles at 17%, compared to 12% in Port clinton.
- Los angeles has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 3.5% in Port clinton.
Demographics
Demographics Port clinton vs Los angeles provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Port clinton | Los angeles |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 9 |
White | 82 | 16 |
Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
Hispanic | 7 | 49 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Port clinton vs Los angeles
- In Los angeles, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Port clinton.
- Port clinton has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 16% in Los angeles.
- In Los angeles, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Port clinton.
- Los angeles has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 7% in Port clinton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Los angeles at 13%, compared to 8% in Port clinton.
- In Los angeles, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Port clinton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Port clinton | Los angeles |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 12.0% |
Depression | 25.1% | 16.1% |
Smoking | 24.0% | 11.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 40.7% | 29.5% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port clinton vs Los angeles
- More residents in Port clinton report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.8% in Los angeles.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port clinton at 25.1% compared to 16.1% in Los angeles.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port clinton at 24.0% compared to 11.8% in Los angeles.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port clinton at 17.9% compared to 14.9% in Los angeles.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port clinton at 40.7% compared to 29.5% in Los angeles.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port clinton at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Los angeles.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Port clinton | Los angeles |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.0% (116,335) |
High School Diploma | 21.7% (1,296) | 12.1% (461,986) |
Less than High School | 17.1% (1,023) | 28.8% (1,101,987) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (825) | 26.2% (1,002,780) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port clinton vs Los angeles
- In Los angeles, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port clinton hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 12.1% in Los angeles.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Los angeles at 28.8%, compared to 17.1% in Port clinton.
- In Los angeles, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 13.8% in Port clinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.