Demographics details for Port clinton, OH vs Howe, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port clinton, OH vs Howe, TX.
| Data | Port clinton | Howe |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,966 | 3,702 |
| Median Age | 44.9 years | 28.2 years |
| Median Income | $55,534 | $59,375 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Port clinton vs Howe
- In Port clinton, the population is higher at 5,966, compared to 3,702 in Howe.
- Residents in Port clinton have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 28.2 years in Howe.
- Howe has a higher median income of $59,375, compared to $55,534 in Port clinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Port clinton at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Howe.
- The poverty level is identical in both Port clinton and Howe at 12%.
- Howe has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Port clinton.
Demographics
Demographics Port clinton vs Howe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port clinton | Howe |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 5 |
| White | 82 | 54 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Port clinton vs Howe
- In Howe, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Port clinton.
- Port clinton has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 54% in Howe.
- Both Port clinton and Howe have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Howe has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 7% in Port clinton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Howe at 12%, compared to 8% in Port clinton.
- In Howe, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Port clinton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port clinton | Howe |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 16.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 36.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port clinton vs Howe
- More residents in Port clinton report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.5% in Howe.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Howe at 25.6% versus 25.1% in Port clinton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port clinton at 24.0% compared to 16.6% in Howe.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Howe at 19.3% compared to 17.9% in Port clinton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port clinton at 40.7% compared to 36.3% in Howe.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port clinton at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Howe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port clinton | Howe |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.7% (136) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (1,296) | 14.0% (518) |
| Less than High School | 17.1% (1,023) | 16.3% (602) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (825) | 8.2% (305) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port clinton vs Howe
- In Howe, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port clinton hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 14.0% in Howe.
- More residents in Port clinton have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 16.3% in Howe.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port clinton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.8% compared to 8.2% in Howe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.