Demographics details for Port clinton, OH vs Hospers, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port clinton, OH vs Hospers, IA.
| Data | Port clinton | Hospers |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,966 | 710 |
| Median Age | 44.9 years | 29.8 years |
| Median Income | $55,534 | $69,659 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 57.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Port clinton vs Hospers
- In Port clinton, the population is higher at 5,966, compared to 710 in Hospers.
- Residents in Port clinton have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 29.8 years in Hospers.
- Hospers has a higher median income of $69,659, compared to $55,534 in Port clinton.
- In Hospers, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 35.0% in Port clinton.
- Port clinton has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Hospers.
- The unemployment rate in Port clinton is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Hospers.
Demographics
Demographics Port clinton vs Hospers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port clinton | Hospers |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 82 | 70 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Port clinton vs Hospers
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port clinton at 3% compared to 0% in Hospers.
- Port clinton has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 70% in Hospers.
- Both Port clinton and Hospers have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Hospers has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 7% in Port clinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port clinton at 8% compared to 3% in Hospers.
- In Hospers, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Port clinton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port clinton | Hospers |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 21.6% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 38.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port clinton vs Hospers
- More residents in Port clinton report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.2% in Hospers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port clinton at 25.1% compared to 16.6% in Hospers.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port clinton at 24.0% compared to 15.2% in Hospers.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hospers at 21.6% compared to 17.9% in Port clinton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port clinton at 40.7% compared to 38.1% in Hospers.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port clinton at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Hospers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port clinton | Hospers |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (1,296) | 26.6% (189) |
| Less than High School | 17.1% (1,023) | 14.4% (102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (825) | 11.3% (80) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port clinton vs Hospers
- In Hospers, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
- In Hospers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.6% compared to 21.7% in Port clinton.
- More residents in Port clinton have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 14.4% in Hospers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port clinton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.8% compared to 11.3% in Hospers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.