Demographics details for Port clinton, OH vs Folsom, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port clinton, OH vs Folsom, PA.
| Data | Port clinton | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,966 | 8,535 |
| Median Age | 44.9 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $55,534 | $95,048 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Port clinton vs Folsom
- The population in Folsom is higher at 8,535, compared to 5,966 in Port clinton.
- Residents in Port clinton have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 37.5 years in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $95,048, compared to $55,534 in Port clinton.
- In Folsom, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 35.0% in Port clinton.
- Port clinton has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Port clinton.
Demographics
Demographics Port clinton vs Folsom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port clinton | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 5 |
| White | 82 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port clinton vs Folsom
- In Folsom, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Port clinton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Folsom at 89% compared to 82% in Port clinton.
- Both Port clinton and Folsom have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port clinton at 7% compared to 4% in Folsom.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port clinton at 8% compared to 2% in Folsom.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port clinton and Folsom at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port clinton | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 31.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port clinton vs Folsom
- More residents in Port clinton report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.5% in Folsom.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port clinton at 25.1% compared to 22.1% in Folsom.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port clinton at 24.0% compared to 16.1% in Folsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Folsom at 18.5% compared to 17.9% in Port clinton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Port clinton at 40.7% compared to 31.2% in Folsom.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port clinton at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port clinton | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (71) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (1,296) | 19.2% (1,635) |
| Less than High School | 17.1% (1,023) | 10.1% (860) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (825) | 20.5% (1,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port clinton vs Folsom
- In Folsom, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port clinton hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 19.2% in Folsom.
- More residents in Port clinton have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 10.1% in Folsom.
- In Folsom, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.5% compared to 13.8% in Port clinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.