Demographics details for Port clinton, OH vs Eatonton, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port clinton, OH vs Eatonton, GA.
| Data | Port clinton | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,966 | 6,545 |
| Median Age | 44.9 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $55,534 | $53,870 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Port clinton vs Eatonton
- The population in Eatonton is higher at 6,545, compared to 5,966 in Port clinton.
- Residents in Port clinton have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 41.1 years in Eatonton.
- Port clinton has a higher median income of $55,534 compared to $53,870 in Eatonton.
- In Eatonton, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 35.0% in Port clinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Eatonton at 14%, compared to 12% in Port clinton.
- Eatonton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Port clinton.
Demographics
Demographics Port clinton vs Eatonton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Port clinton | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 56 |
| White | 82 | 44 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 8 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port clinton vs Eatonton
- In Eatonton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 3% in Port clinton.
- Port clinton has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 44% in Eatonton.
- Both Port clinton and Eatonton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port clinton at 7% compared to 0% in Eatonton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port clinton at 8% compared to 0% in Eatonton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port clinton and Eatonton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Port clinton | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 24.0% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 12.8% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 43.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port clinton vs Eatonton
- In Eatonton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 19.2% in Port clinton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port clinton at 25.1% compared to 20.6% in Eatonton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port clinton at 24.0% compared to 22.9% in Eatonton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Port clinton at 17.9% compared to 12.8% in Eatonton.
- Eatonton has higher obesity rates at 43.6% compared to 40.7% in Port clinton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Eatonton at 22.0% compared to 16.0% in Port clinton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Port clinton | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 21.7% (1,296) | 27.1% (1,772) |
| Less than High School | 17.1% (1,023) | 6.1% (402) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.8% (825) | 13.7% (895) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port clinton vs Eatonton
- In Eatonton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
- In Eatonton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 21.7% in Port clinton.
- More residents in Port clinton have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 6.1% in Eatonton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port clinton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.8% compared to 13.7% in Eatonton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.