Demographics details for Port charlotte, FL vs Yucca valley, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port charlotte, FL vs Yucca valley, CA.

Data Port charlotte Yucca valley
Population 63,913 21,662
Median Age 55.6 years 39.9 years
Median Income $58,799 $54,153
Married Families 45.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 11% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 5.2

Population Comparison: Port charlotte vs Yucca valley

  • In Port charlotte, the population is higher at 63,913, compared to 21,662 in Yucca valley.
  • Residents in Port charlotte have a higher median age of 55.6 years compared to 39.9 years in Yucca valley.
  • Port charlotte has a higher median income of $58,799 compared to $54,153 in Yucca valley.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Port charlotte at 45.0% compared to 34.0% in Yucca valley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Yucca valley at 12%, compared to 11% in Port charlotte.
  • Yucca valley has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in Port charlotte.

Demographics

Demographics Port charlotte vs Yucca valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port charlotte Yucca valley
Black 7 4
White 71 51
Asian 2 2
Hispanic 12 25
Two or More Races 8 16
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Yucca valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port charlotte at 7% compared to 4% in Yucca valley.
  • Port charlotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 51% in Yucca valley.
  • Both Port charlotte and Yucca valley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
  • Yucca valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 12% in Port charlotte.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yucca valley at 16%, compared to 8% in Port charlotte.
  • In Yucca valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Port charlotte.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port charlotte Yucca valley
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 19.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 13.6%
Depression 20.7% 22.0%
Smoking 22.0% 16.7%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 16.4%
Obesity 31.0% 38.8%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Yucca valley

  • In Yucca valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.2% in Port charlotte.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Yucca valley at 22.0% versus 20.7% in Port charlotte.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port charlotte at 22.0% compared to 16.7% in Yucca valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Port charlotte at 16.6% compared to 16.4% in Yucca valley.
  • Yucca valley has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 31.0% in Port charlotte.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port charlotte at 23.0% compared to 20.0% in Yucca valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port charlotte Yucca valley
No Schooling 1.4% (901) 0.9% (191)
High School Diploma 24.2% (15,437) 17.3% (3,754)
Less than High School 14.7% (9,408) 15.6% (3,383)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.0% (10,215) 13.4% (2,907)

Education Levels Comparison: Port charlotte vs Yucca valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.9% in Yucca valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 17.3% in Yucca valley.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yucca valley at 15.6%, compared to 14.7% in Port charlotte.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 13.4% in Yucca valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.