Demographics details for Port charlotte, FL vs Potts camp, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port charlotte, FL vs Potts camp, MS.

Data Port charlotte Potts camp
Population 63,913 409
Median Age 55.6 years 45.6 years
Median Income $58,799 $21,845
Married Families 45.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level 11% 25%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 5.2

Population Comparison: Port charlotte vs Potts camp

  • In Port charlotte, the population is higher at 63,913, compared to 409 in Potts camp.
  • Residents in Port charlotte have a higher median age of 55.6 years compared to 45.6 years in Potts camp.
  • Port charlotte has a higher median income of $58,799 compared to $21,845 in Potts camp.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Port charlotte at 45.0% compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
  • The poverty level is higher in Potts camp at 25%, compared to 11% in Port charlotte.
  • Potts camp has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in Port charlotte.

Demographics

Demographics Port charlotte vs Potts camp provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port charlotte Potts camp
Black 7 13
White 71 80
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 12 Data is updating
Two or More Races 8 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Potts camp

  • In Potts camp, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 7% in Port charlotte.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Potts camp at 80% compared to 71% in Port charlotte.
  • The Asian population is larger in Port charlotte at 2% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Port charlotte at 12% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Port charlotte at 8% compared to 7% in Potts camp.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port charlotte and Potts camp at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port charlotte Potts camp
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 13.0%
Depression 20.7% 23.0%
Smoking 22.0% 21.7%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 13.8%
Obesity 31.0% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Potts camp

  • In Potts camp, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 17.2% in Port charlotte.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Potts camp at 23.0% versus 20.7% in Port charlotte.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port charlotte at 22.0% compared to 21.7% in Potts camp.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Port charlotte at 16.6% compared to 13.8% in Potts camp.
  • Potts camp has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 31.0% in Port charlotte.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port charlotte at 23.0% compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port charlotte Potts camp
No Schooling 1.4% (901) 0.5% (2)
High School Diploma 24.2% (15,437) 13.7% (56)
Less than High School 14.7% (9,408) 12.0% (49)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.0% (10,215) 8.1% (33)

Education Levels Comparison: Port charlotte vs Potts camp

  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Potts camp.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 13.7% in Potts camp.
  • More residents in Port charlotte have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 12.0% in Potts camp.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 8.1% in Potts camp.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.