Demographics details for Port charlotte, FL vs Pittsburg, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port charlotte, FL vs Pittsburg, CA.

Data Port charlotte Pittsburg
Population 63,913 77,572
Median Age 55.6 years 35.2 years
Median Income $58,799 $98,408
Married Families 45.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 11% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.2 5.3

Population Comparison: Port charlotte vs Pittsburg

  • The population in Pittsburg is higher at 77,572, compared to 63,913 in Port charlotte.
  • Residents in Port charlotte have a higher median age of 55.6 years compared to 35.2 years in Pittsburg.
  • Pittsburg has a higher median income of $98,408, compared to $58,799 in Port charlotte.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Port charlotte at 45.0% compared to 37.0% in Pittsburg.
  • Port charlotte has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Pittsburg.
  • Pittsburg has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.2% in Port charlotte.

Demographics

Demographics Port charlotte vs Pittsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port charlotte Pittsburg
Black 7 15
White 71 9
Asian 2 18
Hispanic 12 43
Two or More Races 8 14
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Pittsburg

  • In Pittsburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 7% in Port charlotte.
  • Port charlotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 9% in Pittsburg.
  • In Pittsburg, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 2% in Port charlotte.
  • Pittsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 12% in Port charlotte.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pittsburg at 14%, compared to 8% in Port charlotte.
  • In Pittsburg, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Port charlotte.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port charlotte Pittsburg
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 11.8%
Depression 20.7% 16.7%
Smoking 22.0% 12.7%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 15.0%
Obesity 31.0% 28.4%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Pittsburg

  • More residents in Port charlotte report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.8% in Pittsburg.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Port charlotte at 20.7% compared to 16.7% in Pittsburg.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port charlotte at 22.0% compared to 12.7% in Pittsburg.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Port charlotte at 16.6% compared to 15.0% in Pittsburg.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port charlotte at 31.0% compared to 28.4% in Pittsburg.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port charlotte at 23.0% compared to 13.0% in Pittsburg.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port charlotte Pittsburg
No Schooling 1.4% (901) 3.1% (2,439)
High School Diploma 24.2% (15,437) 14.5% (11,263)
Less than High School 14.7% (9,408) 23.3% (18,048)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.0% (10,215) 14.8% (11,476)

Education Levels Comparison: Port charlotte vs Pittsburg

  • In Pittsburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.4% in Port charlotte.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 14.5% in Pittsburg.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pittsburg at 23.3%, compared to 14.7% in Port charlotte.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 14.8% in Pittsburg.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.