Demographics details for Port charlotte, FL vs Pittsboro, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port charlotte, FL vs Pittsboro, MS.

Data Port charlotte Pittsboro
Population 63,913 157
Median Age 55.6 years 24.9 years
Median Income $58,799 $36,922
Married Families 45.0% 51.0%
Poverty Level 11% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 6.2

Population Comparison: Port charlotte vs Pittsboro

  • In Port charlotte, the population is higher at 63,913, compared to 157 in Pittsboro.
  • Residents in Port charlotte have a higher median age of 55.6 years compared to 24.9 years in Pittsboro.
  • Port charlotte has a higher median income of $58,799 compared to $36,922 in Pittsboro.
  • In Pittsboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 45.0% in Port charlotte.
  • The poverty level is higher in Pittsboro at 13%, compared to 11% in Port charlotte.
  • Pittsboro has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 4.2% in Port charlotte.

Demographics

Demographics Port charlotte vs Pittsboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port charlotte Pittsboro
Black 7 40
White 71 14
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 12 44
Two or More Races 8 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Pittsboro

  • In Pittsboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 7% in Port charlotte.
  • Port charlotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 14% in Pittsboro.
  • The Asian population is larger in Port charlotte at 2% compared to 0% in Pittsboro.
  • Pittsboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 44%, compared to 12% in Port charlotte.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Port charlotte at 8% compared to 2% in Pittsboro.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port charlotte and Pittsboro at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port charlotte Pittsboro
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 14.4%
Depression 20.7% 23.8%
Smoking 22.0% 25.2%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 14.2%
Obesity 31.0% 41.1%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 27.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Pittsboro

  • In Pittsboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.2% in Port charlotte.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Pittsboro at 23.8% versus 20.7% in Port charlotte.
  • Pittsboro has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 22.0% in Port charlotte.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Port charlotte at 16.6% compared to 14.2% in Pittsboro.
  • Pittsboro has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 31.0% in Port charlotte.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pittsboro at 27.0% compared to 23.0% in Port charlotte.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port charlotte Pittsboro
No Schooling 1.4% (901) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 24.2% (15,437) 19.7% (31)
Less than High School 14.7% (9,408) 20.4% (32)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.0% (10,215) 13.4% (21)

Education Levels Comparison: Port charlotte vs Pittsboro

  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Pittsboro.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 19.7% in Pittsboro.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pittsboro at 20.4%, compared to 14.7% in Port charlotte.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 13.4% in Pittsboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.