Demographics details for Port charlotte, FL vs Pendergrass, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port charlotte, FL vs Pendergrass, GA.

Data Port charlotte Pendergrass
Population 63,913 1,758
Median Age 55.6 years 31.8 years
Median Income $58,799 $73,947
Married Families 45.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 11% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 2.5

Population Comparison: Port charlotte vs Pendergrass

  • In Port charlotte, the population is higher at 63,913, compared to 1,758 in Pendergrass.
  • Residents in Port charlotte have a higher median age of 55.6 years compared to 31.8 years in Pendergrass.
  • Pendergrass has a higher median income of $73,947, compared to $58,799 in Port charlotte.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Port charlotte at 45.0% compared to 36.0% in Pendergrass.
  • The poverty level is higher in Pendergrass at 12%, compared to 11% in Port charlotte.
  • The unemployment rate in Port charlotte is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Pendergrass.

Demographics

Demographics Port charlotte vs Pendergrass provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port charlotte Pendergrass
Black 7 15
White 71 55
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 12 19
Two or More Races 8 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Pendergrass

  • In Pendergrass, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 7% in Port charlotte.
  • Port charlotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 55% in Pendergrass.
  • In Pendergrass, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Port charlotte.
  • Pendergrass has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 12% in Port charlotte.
  • Both Port charlotte and Pendergrass have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port charlotte and Pendergrass at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port charlotte Pendergrass
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 17.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 12.4%
Depression 20.7% 23.8%
Smoking 22.0% 18.6%
Binge Drinking 16.6% 17.1%
Obesity 31.0% 32.0%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 4.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Pendergrass

  • In Pendergrass, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 17.2% in Port charlotte.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Pendergrass at 23.8% versus 20.7% in Port charlotte.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port charlotte at 22.0% compared to 18.6% in Pendergrass.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Pendergrass at 17.1% compared to 16.6% in Port charlotte.
  • Pendergrass has higher obesity rates at 32.0% compared to 31.0% in Port charlotte.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port charlotte at 23.0% compared to 4.0% in Pendergrass.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port charlotte Pendergrass
No Schooling 1.4% (901) 1.9% (33)
High School Diploma 24.2% (15,437) 13.6% (239)
Less than High School 14.7% (9,408) 18.0% (317)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.0% (10,215) 11.4% (201)

Education Levels Comparison: Port charlotte vs Pendergrass

  • In Pendergrass, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 1.4% in Port charlotte.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 13.6% in Pendergrass.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pendergrass at 18.0%, compared to 14.7% in Port charlotte.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.0% compared to 11.4% in Pendergrass.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.