Demographics details for Port charlotte, FL vs Marlboro, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Port charlotte, FL vs Marlboro, NJ.

Data Port charlotte Marlboro
Population 63,913 41,480
Median Age 55.6 years 43.5 years
Median Income $58,799 $170,357
Married Families 45.0% 53.0%
Poverty Level 11% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.0

Population Comparison: Port charlotte vs Marlboro

  • In Port charlotte, the population is higher at 63,913, compared to 41,480 in Marlboro.
  • Residents in Port charlotte have a higher median age of 55.6 years compared to 43.5 years in Marlboro.
  • Marlboro has a higher median income of $170,357, compared to $58,799 in Port charlotte.
  • In Marlboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 45.0% in Port charlotte.
  • Port charlotte has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Marlboro.
  • The unemployment rate in Port charlotte is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.0% in Marlboro.

Demographics

Demographics Port charlotte vs Marlboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Port charlotte Marlboro
Black 7 2
White 71 67
Asian 2 22
Hispanic 12 5
Two or More Races 8 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Marlboro

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port charlotte at 7% compared to 2% in Marlboro.
  • Port charlotte has a higher percentage of White residents at 71% compared to 67% in Marlboro.
  • In Marlboro, the Asian population stands at 22%, greater than 2% in Port charlotte.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Port charlotte at 12% compared to 5% in Marlboro.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Port charlotte at 8% compared to 4% in Marlboro.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port charlotte and Marlboro at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Port charlotte Marlboro
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% Data is updating%
Depression 20.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 22.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.6% Data is updating%
Obesity 31.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Marlboro

  • More residents in Port charlotte report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Port charlotte at 20.7% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Port charlotte at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Port charlotte at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Port charlotte at 31.0% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Port charlotte at 23.0% compared to 8.0% in Marlboro.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Port charlotte Marlboro
No Schooling 1.4% (901) 0.8% (336)
High School Diploma 24.2% (15,437) 8.6% (3,576)
Less than High School 14.7% (9,408) 3.2% (1,348)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.0% (10,215) 43.0% (17,837)

Education Levels Comparison: Port charlotte vs Marlboro

  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.8% in Marlboro.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 8.6% in Marlboro.
  • More residents in Port charlotte have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 3.2% in Marlboro.
  • In Marlboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.0% compared to 16.0% in Port charlotte.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.