Demographics details for Port charlotte, FL vs Grinnell, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Port charlotte, FL vs Grinnell, KS.
Data | Port charlotte | Grinnell |
---|---|---|
Population | 63,913 | 254 |
Median Age | 55.6 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $58,799 | $56,042 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 58.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Port charlotte vs Grinnell
- In Port charlotte, the population is higher at 63,913, compared to 254 in Grinnell.
- Residents in Port charlotte have a higher median age of 55.6 years compared to 37.9 years in Grinnell.
- Port charlotte has a higher median income of $58,799 compared to $56,042 in Grinnell.
- In Grinnell, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 45.0% in Port charlotte.
- The poverty level is higher in Grinnell at 12%, compared to 11% in Port charlotte.
- The unemployment rate in Port charlotte is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Grinnell.
Demographics
Demographics Port charlotte vs Grinnell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Port charlotte | Grinnell |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | Data is updating |
White | 71 | 100 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 8 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Grinnell
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Port charlotte at 7% compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grinnell at 100% compared to 71% in Port charlotte.
- The Asian population is larger in Port charlotte at 2% compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Port charlotte at 12% compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Port charlotte at 8% compared to 0% in Grinnell.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Port charlotte and Grinnell at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Port charlotte | Grinnell |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 9.6% |
Depression | 20.7% | 20.1% |
Smoking | 22.0% | 17.6% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 20.4% |
Obesity | 31.0% | 38.3% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Port charlotte vs Grinnell
- More residents in Port charlotte report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.1% in Grinnell.
- Depression is more prevalent in Port charlotte at 20.7% compared to 20.1% in Grinnell.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Port charlotte at 22.0% compared to 17.6% in Grinnell.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grinnell at 20.4% compared to 16.6% in Port charlotte.
- Grinnell has higher obesity rates at 38.3% compared to 31.0% in Port charlotte.
- Disability percentages are higher in Port charlotte at 23.0% compared to 15.0% in Grinnell.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Port charlotte | Grinnell |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (901) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 24.2% (15,437) | 18.9% (48) |
Less than High School | 14.7% (9,408) | 16.5% (42) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (10,215) | 16.9% (43) |
Education Levels Comparison: Port charlotte vs Grinnell
- A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Grinnell.
- A higher percentage of residents in Port charlotte hold a high school diploma at 24.2% compared to 18.9% in Grinnell.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grinnell at 16.5%, compared to 14.7% in Port charlotte.
- In Grinnell, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 16.0% in Port charlotte.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.